Purpose: Ensure your AI initiatives have appropriate oversight, controls, and accountability from conception through deployment and monitoring.
Use This For: Every AI project, before initial approval and at key milestones
Outcome: Clear governance framework that balances innovation speed with responsible AI practices
| ✓ | Checkpoint | Responsible Party | Status / Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Executive Sponsor Identified Senior leader accountable for project outcomes and governance |
|||
| Business Case Approved Clear ROI, strategic alignment, and success metrics documented |
|||
| Stakeholder Analysis Complete All impacted parties identified and engagement plan created |
|||
| Risk Assessment Conducted Technical, operational, reputational risks identified and mitigated |
|||
| Budget & Resources Allocated Full project costs approved including ongoing operations |
| ✓ | Checkpoint | Responsible Party | Status / Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethical Review Completed AI Ethics Committee (or equivalent) has reviewed and approved project |
|||
| Bias & Fairness Assessment Potential for discriminatory outcomes evaluated and mitigation planned |
|||
| Privacy Impact Assessment Data privacy risks evaluated per GDPR, CCPA, or applicable regulations |
|||
| Transparency Requirements Defined What will be disclosed to users about AI decision-making? |
|||
| Explainability Standards Set Can AI decisions be explained to users, regulators, auditors? |
|||
| Human Oversight Defined When and how will humans review/override AI decisions? |
|||
| Regulatory Compliance Verified Legal review confirms compliance with industry-specific regulations |
| ✓ | Checkpoint | Responsible Party | Status / Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Inventory Complete All data sources documented including origin, owner, refresh rate |
|||
| Data Quality Assessed Accuracy, completeness, consistency evaluated and acceptable |
|||
| Data Lineage Documented End-to-end data flow mapped and understood |
|||
| Data Access Controls Implemented Role-based access, encryption, audit logging in place |
|||
| Data Retention Policy Defined How long will training/operational data be retained? |
|||
| Third-Party Data Agreements Contracts allow AI use? IP ownership clear? Vendor security vetted? |
| ✓ | Checkpoint | Responsible Party | Status / Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model Development Standards Code review, version control, documentation standards followed |
|||
| Model Performance Benchmarks Minimum accuracy, precision, recall thresholds defined and met |
|||
| Bias Testing Completed Model tested across demographic groups, edge cases, adversarial inputs |
|||
| Security Testing Passed Vulnerability assessment, penetration testing, model robustness verified |
|||
| User Acceptance Testing Business users validate model outputs and usability |
|||
| Failure Mode Analysis What happens when model fails? Graceful degradation planned? |
All checkpoints above must be complete before production deployment.
| ✓ | Checkpoint | Responsible Party | Status / Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deployment Plan Approved Phased rollout, rollback plan, success criteria defined |
|||
| User Communication Complete Users informed about AI system, capabilities, limitations |
|||
| Training Materials Ready User guides, FAQs, training programs available |
|||
| Support Processes Established Helpdesk trained, escalation paths defined, feedback mechanism live |
|||
| Incident Response Plan Who responds to model failures, bias incidents, security breaches? |
| ✓ | Checkpoint | Responsible Party | Status / Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Model Performance Monitoring Accuracy, drift detection, anomaly detection automated and tracked |
|||
| Bias Monitoring Active Ongoing evaluation of fairness metrics across user segments |
|||
| User Feedback Collection Process for capturing and acting on user-reported issues |
|||
| Business Impact Measurement KPIs tracked, ROI calculated, value realization monitored |
|||
| Model Retraining Schedule When and how will model be updated? Version control in place? |
|||
| Audit Trail Maintained All decisions, changes, incidents logged for compliance/audit |
|||
| Governance Review Cadence Quarterly reviews with AI governance committee scheduled |
| Issue Type | Escalate To | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Model performance below threshold | AI Product Owner → CTO | Within 24 hours |
| Bias or fairness concern identified | AI Ethics Committee | Immediate |
| Security vulnerability discovered | CISO → Executive Leadership | Immediate |
| Regulatory compliance question | Legal / Compliance Officer | Within 48 hours |
| Data privacy incident | DPO → Legal → CEO | Immediate |
| Reputational risk (media, social) | Communications → CEO | Within 4 hours |
| Project budget overrun >20% | Executive Sponsor → CFO | Within 1 week |
R = Responsible | A = Accountable | C = Consulted | I = Informed
| Governance Activity | Exec Sponsor | Product Owner | Data Science | Legal/Compliance | IT/Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project approval | A | R | C | C | I |
| Ethical review | I | C | R | A | C |
| Model development | I | A | R | C | C |
| Security testing | I | C | C | C | A, R |
| Production deployment | A | R | C | I | R |
| Ongoing monitoring | I | A | R | C | R |
Customize this matrix for your organization:
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________